 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
| Behind every investigation lies a story, behind every trial lies the truth.
THE ORAL FALSE CONFESSION AND OBSTRUCTION OF THE JUSTICE.
I certainly never told Sung Park I transferred anything. As in nothing. By the way, anyone seen an expert? If so, please have him examine our LOGS JUDGE KOZINSKI SEEMS TO BELIEVE MYSTERIOUS THINGS HAPPEN WITH THE INTERNET, LIKE "ACCIDENTAL FACTS" ROUTED JUST TO HIS TINY WIZARD MIND, TO GIVE HIM JURISDICTION WHERE HE HAS NO FACTS, OTHER THEN A FALSE CONFESSION. HE WAS ABLE TO EXTRACT THIS ‘SUDDEN CONFESSION OF GUILT’ ONLY AFTER HE SPOON- FEEDS THE WORDS TO MAKE HIS FALSE RECORD. HE HAD TO GET AROUND THE FACT THAT THE GOVERNMENT'S BURDEN IS THEY MUST PROVE I TRANSMITTED, NOT JUST ASSUME IT. THEY DID NOT, FALSE CONFESSION NOTWITHSTANDING. THE SAME FACT APPLIES TO THE CLAIM I "INSISTED ON FIRING" ALL 6 ATTORNEYS. ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER. -U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.
Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? (c)1997-2023 |
He "Sung" Like A Bird. The "Appeal" Of Sung Park, ESQUIRE. Meet the government's "re-presenter," AKA the Public Pretender, who is but one of many forced on the accused. Right after his fraudulent and false confession to the Ninth Circuit, he quit, in the parking lot, and went to work for Rob Bonner, Judge A. Howard Matz's good friend. How you like those rotten apples?
Since Sung Park, Esquire, one of several rampant attorneys at large, and almost the last of many conflicted ones, forced by the Ninth Circuit; currently employed by Rob Bonner of Homeland Security, the day after the appeal, (think about that one for a moment) knew for a fact that the accused never would, or did, admit transmitting anything against the law; and nor did the government ever prove he did transmit anything against the law, why would he falsely confess that the accused was guilty of transmitting anything when he knew the government had no proof.
Or why would the appeals court judge Alex Kozinski, force-feed him more lies, and he admit to those spoon-fed lies, knowing they were lies he could never prove.
Examine some of the players, then play connect the dots...
You might find violations of the rights under the Bill of Rights, euphemistically labeled technical errors. Those are now sometimes called "entitlements." That way, a technical error of an entitlement is not the same as a flagrant violation of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution they swore to uphold, defend, protect and serve.
Especially when they know the burden of the requirements of the law. To wit, a "transfer across state lines."
No transfer across state lines means no jurisdiction.
So they ignore the laws of MAC, the NIC and IP.
Makes no sense. As in none, zero, zip, zilch, nada.
THE TWITTER
THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES,THE LAWS, AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE
CLICK HERE FOR ALL SALES OFFERS. (c)1997-2023
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
