FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998
email

CONTACT KILLERCOP

MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

PLAYING STUPID IS NOT A HEALTHY WAY TO GO THROUGH LIFE. NEITHER IS PLAYING IGNORE THE FACTS OF YOUR LIFE.


The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right...to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor..." U.S. CONST. amend. VI.

The Supreme Court has held that this right includes "[t]he right to offer the testimony of witnesses, and to compel their attendance, if necessary, [and] is in plain terms the right to present the defendant's version of the facts [i.e. a defense]..." Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14, 19, 87 S. Ct. 1920, 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967).

 

Furthermore, a defendant's right to compulsory process "is a fundamental element of due process of law." Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. at 19.

 

Twenty years after Washington v. Texas, the Supreme Court noted in Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, 107 S. Ct. 989, 94 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987) that "[o]ur cases establish, at a minimum, that criminal defendants have the right to the government's assistance in compelling the attendance of favorable witnesses at trial and the right to put before a jury evidence that might influence the determination of guilt." Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. at 56.

 

A defendant's right to compulsory process is violated by arbitrary rules of evidence that operate to deny the defendant the right to call witnesses whose testimony is relevant and material to the defense. Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 52, 107 S.Ct. 2704, 97 L. Ed.2d 37 (1987).

 

"The very integrity of the judicial system and public confidence in the system depends on full disclosure of all the facts, within the framework of the rules of evidence.

 

To ensure that justice is done, it is imperative to the function of courts that compulsory process be available for the production of evidence needed either by the prosecution or by the defense." United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 709, 94 S.Ct. 3090, 41 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1974).

 

NO MEANS NO

A SIMPLE FACT TO LEAVE YOU WITH TO SAY THANKS FOR COMING BY HERE TO LISTEN TO MY WORDS.

DON'T RETREAT AMERICA, RELOAD.

 

 

"ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL THAT EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER." U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

WHAT WOULD BE THE CAPACITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OF THE COURTS TO SUPRESS THIS KIND OF SPEECH?" --Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL OF KILLERCOP

FAKE NEWS - LIAR

EPIC CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right.

Do you understand?

NO?

ARE YOU STILL BAFFFLED?

WIKI

WOUNDED WIKI

FAQ 1 FAQ 2

FACEBOOK AND THE TWITTER

YOUTUBE

STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES.

GUMP MOMENTS

A.K.A. THE CASE OF THE GUMP MOMENTS OF HIZZZZZZ ODER.


Primary investigative jurisdiction of offenses in 18 U.S.C. § 1951 lies with the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Baby Judge A. Howard Matz

"Judge A. Howard Matz can play stupid with the best of them, I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid

Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. He's trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid.

Some pure essence of a stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that we know." ~Killercop

 

ALEX KOZINSKI COMMITS AND COVERED UP CRIMES

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.

A COVER UP BY JUDGE ALEX KOZINSKI

POD SERVER

Sponsored By Psych Ward Entertainment.

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright 1997-2022

THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME IS FOR SALE.

EMAIL KILLERCOP

Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.