 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CONTACT EMAIL KILLERCOP @ KILLERCOP.COM |
|
||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
CASE MOTIONS CASE NAME: People of CA vs. killercop CASE NUMBER: 0001 DATE FILED: 6/24/97 "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT DIRTY SECRETS AND MENTAL TORTURE TREATMENTS TO RESTORE YOUR MIND. (c) 1995-2026 |
CASE MOTIONS CASE NAME: People of CA vs. killercop 1.
Motion to return private property unlawfully seized on 6/13/97
MOTIONS TO BE HEARD
MOTION: Motion to return private property (Audiotape) illegally seized
on 6/13/97 by City Attorney David Scheieiman, in front of
Commissioner Diane Wheatly in Div. 92.
1.
Constitution violations
2.
Petty theft
1.
City Attorney David Scheieiman
ADDITIONAL
DOCUMENTS REQUIRED
1.
None
This letter is to serve notice that on 6/13/97, in Div. 92, David Scheieiman, then City Attorney in the above matter instructed Commissioner Diane Wheatly to illegally seize a personal audiotape belonging to him, located in his personal briefcase. Commissioner Wheatly was removed from the case pursuant to a Motion 170.6 filed with this court on 6/17/97. I wish to have
an immediate hearing into this matter, to have my personal
belongings returned at once, or to bring forth a charge
against the City Attorney for Petty Theft, a crime under
California law.
RESULT
OF MOTION
GRANTED
__X__
DENIED
____
OTHER
____
Footnote: My tape was returned at my next hearing in front of Debra Wong Yang, after filing this motion. Debra Yang thereafter "selectively" prosecuted me in federal court. As did the LAPD. Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ EMAIL SALES @ KILLERCOP.COM (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
