 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
3 questions remain in anthrax case. • Can the FBI prove that a flask of anthrax in Ivins' laboratory at Fort Detrick, Md., contained the same mutated strain of powder that was in the envelopes mailed to two U.S. senators? • Did Ivins, who committed suicide last week, have the technical capability to produce that form of anthrax? • Why, after he came under suspicion in 2005 or earlier, was Ivins allowed to continue working in the bioweapons laboratory at Fort Detrick? • Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Rep. Rush Holt, D-N.J., frequent critics of the FBI, demanded the release of more documents and hearings.
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. (c) 1995-2026 |
Mistakes and lies cost Americans lives by the F.B.I. Attorney General John Ashcroft labeled Dr. Steven Hatfill a "person of interest" in a press conference, no charges were brought against him. Hatfill, a virologist, vehemently denied he had anything to do with the anthrax (bacteria) mailings and sued the FBI, the Justice Department, John Ashcroft, Alberto Gonzales, and others for violating his constitutional rights and for violating the Privacy Act. On June 27, 2008, the Department of Justice announced it would settle Hatfill's case for $5.8 million. Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
