 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
“There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, you were not mad.” -1984
"I want to assure the court. We agonized over this." "At best, her extraordinary disregard for the constitutional role demonstrates incompetence; at worst, it creates the impression that she knowingly attempted to hide her most controversial work." "Her unwillingness to take seriously her obligation to protect basic fundamental rights has potentially placed her court in jeopardy." CALL JUDGE ELENA J. DUARTE: EMAIL JUDGE ELENA J. DUARTE ASK HER WHAT WAS SHE AND MATZ SMOKING? NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET: MORE DENIAL OF A RIGHT TO BE INFORMED OF THE NATURE OF THE CRIME. INFORMATION! CONTACT KILLERCOP IF YOU CAN, PROMPTLY!! IT'S A PRUDENT THING TO DO, IN AMERICA ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER. -U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. WHAT WOULD BE THE CAPACITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OF THE COURTS TO SUPRESS THIS KIND OF SPEECH?" --Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL OF KILLERCOP
CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.
Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled?
Copyright 1997-2023 |
"Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered."
A SECRET FROM THE KEY OF THE KNOWLEDGE SAY WHAT? THE FOLLOWING TAKES PLACE ON 04.07.2003 IN DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT COURT. Judge A. Howard Matz: "The defendant's personal presence is not necessary, given that he's currently represented by Mr. Nicolaysen." Nicolaysen: "Thank you so much. Your honor, government counsel tracks my thinking as well. I want to assure the court. We agonized over this. We spent well over an hour on the phone Friday. Spoke again on Saturday anticipating that your honor may very well want some feedback on this very point, so we're not trying to put words into the court's mouth by asking you to make a finding [of a fact] that you didn't make; however --"
Doctor Phil Says: Anything Coming Out Of The Mouth After "However," Negates Everything Before That Word. FOR THE RECORD. You don't even have to be there to be judged and examined and "found;" pardon the expression, "incompetent." I Wish they could have found a law book instead. Maybe then they would have read it. Or did they? I guess we shall have to agonize over whether they did or did not, "probably." They just make it look like I were there, for the record, with Rule 43, by forcing representatives; who refuse to assist, and are conflicted, and quacks who pretend to assist. Then disappear leaving the judge baffled. Like your right to ignore. Did you know you even had that right?
Crackers, if ya ask me. But remember, "that's not an issue that I have to address and it's not a question I'm required to answer, so I decline to do so." But if you do ask me, I promise to answer you back "promptly." I have nothing to hide, unlike my Censorers.
THE TWITTER
THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored. This is a battle for speech and the First Amendment needs your support, or it is gone. Any amount helps in the battle! Thank you and may God bless you, in peace and at war. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
