CONTACT KILLERCOP

"Some "arguments" are thinly veiled "incitements" to "violence" against individuals and should be punished for the crimes they are."

NO, THEY ARE NOT! THEY ARE SPEECHS. PERIOD.

YOU MEAN SUGGESTIONS. BUT NOT LIKE SUGGGESTIONS TO A CAPTIVE AUDIENCE, RIGHT? IF SO THEN YOUR SPEECH IS A CRIME, TOO.

HERE COMES THE SPEECH COPS FOR THE THOUGHT CRIMES!! NOW WHO IS THE "TRUE" TERRORIST? AND EXTREAMIST? FACIST? RIGHTWING "NUT JOB?"

ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER. -U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975)

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.

When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions.

Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson

CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled?

WOUNDED WIKI

WSJ

NY TIMES

TERMS OF USE

DISCLAIMER

PRIVACY POLICY

GOFUNDME

(c)1997-2023

Editorial June 2, 2009

Dr. George Tiller's assassination is no reason to suppress speech

Activists on either side of the abortion debate should not try to exploit his killing to score political points.

The assassination of Dr. George Tiller, long targeted by extremists because he performed late-term abortions, is a reminder that fringe adherents of the "pro-life" movement are willing to desecrate the very value they claim to champion. But it distorts reality to insinuate that millions of Americans who oppose abortion condone such tactics. Tiller's killing shouldn't be exploited by activists on either side to score political points.

Tiller, who was shot as he attended a Sunday church service in Wichita, Kan., is the fifth abortion doctor to be killed. In 1993, he was shot in both arms by an abortion protester. Violence and intimidation at abortion clinics have been so widespread that Congress in 1994 enacted the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, which makes it a federal crime "to injure, intimidate or interfere with persons seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services."

Sadly, Tiller's assailant is not one of a kind, but neither is he typical of the antiabortion movement. Prominent pro-life organizations long have condemned violence against abortion providers while working to restrict the late-term abortions for which Tiller was known. His killing was forthrightly condemned by the National Right to Life Committee, Americans United for Life and Kansas' four Catholic bishops. (A tasteless exception was the reaction of Randall Terry, the former head of Operation Rescue, who said that Tiller "reaped what he sowed.")

Despite these statements, some pro-choice activists are suggesting, overtly or subtly, that the responsibility for Tiller's death is shared by the broader pro-life movement. The president of NARAL Pro-Choice America said: "We also call on opponents of a woman's right to choose to condemn this action completely and absolutely." The implication is that the mainstream pro-life movement has to be nudged into opposing violence. People for the American Way said that "it's impossible to separate today's tragedy from the violent language that has been directed for years at doctors like George Tiller. Those who have inflamed emotions and dehumanized their opponents should take pause before they continue such dangerous rhetoric."

Some "arguments" are thinly veiled incitements to violence against individuals and should be punished for the crimes they are.

But the basic premise of the antiabortion movement -- that a fetus is a person -- is by definition a "dehumanization" of abortion providers, even if it's expressed in decorous language. The militancy of some pro-life groups constitutes an alarming assault on a constitutionally protected right, but the answer is not to limit expression. It's unfair to ask antiabortion activists to muffle their message because it might inspire an unbalanced individual to commit an atrocity.

THE TWITTER

THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES,THE LAWS, AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.

"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel

With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored.

TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE

FAQ 1 FAQ 2 CONTEXT

CLICK HERE FOR ALL SALES OFFERS.

(c)1997-2023

All Rights Reserved.